Bringing forth evidence for claims or allegations is a basic premise of law and should be of public debate. But it bears asking why the burden of proof should fall entirely on those who doubt the validity of our elections, the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine, the wisdom of the lockdowns, and any other position that contradicts The Approved Narrative.
In this video, we draw on the rules of law to answer the following questions:
1)Whose responsibility is it to bear the burden of proof?
2)What level of proof should be considered sufficient?
3)Can the burden of proof shift as the debate moves forward?
RELATED CONTENT
How The 2020 Election Was Stolen
Why I’m Not Taking The Vaccine
COVID-19 & The Catholic Church
Is A Government Legitimate Or Not?
Arizona On The Threshold
2024 GOP PRESIDENTIAL SWEEPSTAKES
Trump & The Vaccine: The Elephant In The Room
Can You Have Trumpism Without Trump?
It’s Time For Ron DeSantis To Stand Down
Shifting The Burden of Proof: On Elections, Vaccines & More